on coaching software development teams, being a Dad, and the art of change.
I would much rather aim for 100% test-driven development than aim for 100% test coverage. It seems odd to want to use coverage tools to determine after-the-fact that the development process isn't working as intended, rather than to work constantly with development teams at the source of the problem. High path and branch coverage is a byproduct of the effective use of TDD, not the aim of it.
posted on 15.11.03 -- permalink
0 comments
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Tim specialises in assisting teams or organisations to introduce Agile software development methods such as Scrum or XP. He is a passionate "people person" and an advocate of test driven development and software craftsmanship, with over a decade's experience working with software development teams in the UK, Ireland, Netherlands, Sweden and Switzerland. Tim enjoys his work most when helping teams to see that they can produce more and better software with less stress.
The views expressed here are my own and neither my employers nor any other party necessarily agrees with them.
